Center For Energy & Environmental Policy



(Pictured: David T. Stevenson, CRI Policy Director)

Center For Energy & Environmental Policy

Our mission is to oppose expensive government energy & environmental policies that our research has proven don’t work, and to promote policies that do work, and often cost less. 
Some examples below:
 
  • Electric generators in Delaware must buy allowances to emit carbon dioxide from a multi-state Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI).  After a decade the program hasn’t worked to reduce emissions globally.  It has contributed to higher electric rates.  Those higher rates hurt the poor the most, and has chased energy intensive manufacturing facilities and electric generating out of state.  CRI is promoting a multi-pronged strategy to end participation in RGGI by Delaware and other states.
 
  • Delaware forces electric utilities to buy an annually increasing amount of renewable energy credits from power sources such as fuel cells, wind, and solar.  After a decade of effort, less than 2 percent of our in-state power production comes from renewable sources, but Delmarva Power customers have been committed to about $750 million in premium payments.  A promise to freeze the annual increases if cost on electric bills exceeds 3 percent was broken in 2012, and now adds about 15 percent.  CRI has succeeded in enforcing the regulation, but will now be fighting legislation to eliminate the cost cap.  We are also encouraging rule changes that would allow more installations of large scale solar projects that are now competitively priced and require no government regulation, or subsidies.
 
  • CRI is fighting efforts by Delmarva Power to enter the electric vehicle charging market with a guaranteed 9.75% profit margin with the cost, and risks transferred to their electric customers.
 
  • CRI is also fighting refrigerant industry efforts to shield their new products from competition by banning existing products through EPA regulations, and international treaties.  The new products cost ten times more than existing products, and a treaty would obligate the U.S. to pay $1.3 billion to the wasteful United Nations.  
 
Please contact David T. Stevenson, Policy Director with any inquiries!
 

Please click below to read letter and summary.
PDF Doc

...
PDF Doc

...
PDF Doc

Executive Summary:  The stage for action on energy policy is shifting from the federal level to the states.  Significant de-regulation has occurred under President Trump.  The EPA is no longer driving closure of coal-fired power plants, federal lands have been opened for explor...

Read More
PDF Doc

A Review of Gabel Associates, Inc. Report:   "Benefit Cost Analysis for Electric Vehicle Adoption in the DE DPL Territory"            
PDF Doc

Numerous programs have been suggested to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide to ease global warming concerns. Few are as expensive as switching to battery powered motor vehicles. A comparison between the Chevrolet Bolt battery electric compact hatchback, and its near twin Chevrolet Cruze hatchback po...

Read More

(Originally published on 7/23/2018) Executive Summary     A debate is under way as to whether U.S Senate ratification of the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol will be good for the U.S. economy.  At its heart the treaty aims to replace hydrofluorocarbons (HFC) refrigera...

Read More
PDF Doc

Reliable, low cost electric power is critical to maintaining economic growth and our quality of life. Life expectancy has doubled, and the economy has grown eight-fold since 1900 with both directly linked to the growth of the electric industry. The effect is being replicated in developing ...

Read More

In 2014, for the first time, Delaware met all Air Quality Standards for every measured pollutant. That is an “A” in my book! Yet the American Lung Association (ALA) just released a report giving Delaware an “F” grade for air quality. How could that be?   Start by fol...

Read More

The EPA altered regulations to switch to a new class of refrigerants that supposedly reduces global warming.  The reality is by 2100 the change will reduce forecasted temperature by 0.001 degree C, but will cost billions, add up to $70 to every new automobile, and increase flammability.  R...

Read More
PDF Doc