On September 27, 2022, the Rehoboth Beach City Council convened a seminar on offshore wind to hear opposing views on the impacts of wind projects off the Delaware coast. Attending the conference were the top four individuals who run BOEM.
During the conference, there was a lively debate about the UD Study. The discussion points were all from the Study:
During the seminar, rather than defend their UD Study, the authors offered "new studies" conducted by others they claimed supported their UD Study's conclusion. At the very end of the recorded debate, the UD Study's authors admitted there would be negative impacts on tourism and property values would fall, but provided no estimates. One might conclude BOEM's decision to stop using the UD Study was the outcome of this debate.
BOEM needs to conduct a new study before issuing any more EIS documents. UD should be disqualified from conducting the new Study.
BOEM Contradicting Words in its EIS Documents: Major vs. Negligible
One of the topics in the EIS is to determine the "impact" of visible turbines on beach economies. BOEM routinely admits the "impact" is major and often summarizes this:
"The daytime presence of offshore turbines, as well as turbine nighttime lighting, would change perception of ocean scenes from natural and undeveloped to a developed wind energy environment. In clear weather, the turbines would be an unavoidable presence and dominate views from the coastline" BOEM anticipates that the overall impacts associated with the Proposed Action when combined with the impacts from ongoing and planned activities including other offshore wind development would be major."
However, despite their summary, BOEM stated the economic impact would be negligible in the Draft EIS for the Ocean Wind 1 project, published on June 24, 2022.